In cautious defense of the SAT
There’s a lot of controversy over what the SAT actually measures — and, in fact, whether it actually measures anything at all. Although the test was originally conceived as a form of IQ test, the notion that it is actually capable of measuring innate scholastic ability has essentially been debunked, as has the notion that it can successfully predict a student’s ultimate success or failure in college (the only thing it has been shown to correlate with is freshman college grades). So the question remains then: if the SAT does not actually measure intelligence or academic potential, what on earth does it actually measure?
My response, thoroughly non-empirical and based strictly on personal experience, would be as follows: the SAT (Critical Reading) measures students’ ability to understand, summarize, make simple inferences, and compare arguments from relatively sophisticated texts — in other words, skills that students at competitive colleges must at minimum possess in order to be successful. After all, if you can’t truly understand someone else’s argument based on a close reading of specific textual elements, how can you possibly formulate a coherent response to it?